网站访问量:8929093699

首页-营商环境-延期开庭情况

开庭公告
开庭公告
减刑假释类公示
其他
全站检索

中文 | English

Adjournment Number of Court Sessions Reasons for Adjournment

Reasons for Adjournment

Court Number and reasons of adjournment
A party fails to appear in court Request for disqualification It is necessary to notify a new witness to appear in court It is necessary to collect new evidence It is necessary to conduct re-identification or resurvey It is necessary to conduct further investigation Force majeure Accident Others
High... 68 2 3 24 1 25 7 2 0
First... 211 0 5 49 4 110 0 1 1
Second... 333 14 16 103 2 329 27 9 2
Third... 477 12 62 187 5 566 0 2 3
Fourth... 114 1 12 7 0 31 0 4 0
Intell... 179 0 2 7 1 47 5 0 1
Financ... 355 1 6 100 0 215 0 0 0
Dongcheng 804 8 85 1586 45 958 0 0 6
Xicheng 1375 13 121 3053 130 1208 0 3 1
Chaoyang 1209 26 85 1048 54 550 0 0 1
Haidian 520 4 62 945 26 518 1 3 8
Fengtai 1823 34 108 2945 121 1565 4 3 0
Shijingshan 159 2 28 783 20 225 0 1 4
Mentougou 87 3 30 238 8 115 0 0 0
Fangshan 421 48 40 768 59 1044 1 0 0
Tongzhou 2084 9 74 1796 72 1699 0 1 7
Daxing 1201 15 50 391 36 597 0 0 1
Shunyi 169 6 33 996 55 1171 1 2 0
Changping 1210 19 64 991 62 1617 0 1 3
Huairou 122 1 23 591 44 384 0 0 3
Pinggu 264 7 30 297 28 662 1 0 3
Miyun 183 2 64 542 31 306 0 0 0
Yanqing 141 4 13 158 22 211 1 0 0
Internet... 1318 2 90 846 4 1431 0 0 1

Statistical description:
1.Legal basis: Article 146 of “Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China” and Article 2 of “Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Strictly Regulating the Issues on Extending the Time Limit for Trial and Postponing the Hearing for Civil and Commercial Cases (2019 Amendment)” (hereafter referred to as the “Provisions”) stipulate the legal circumstances of continuance for civil and commercial cases. For details, it includes the following 8 circumstances listed in the table: (1) A party (or any other litigation participant which must appear in court) fails to appear in court (Article 146, Item 1 of the Civil Procedure Law) (2) A party files an unexpected request for disqualification (Article 146, Item 2 of the Civil Procedure Law), (3) It is necessary to notify a new witness to appear in court (Article 146, Item 3 of the Civil Procedure Law), (4) It is necessary to collect new evidence, (5) It is necessary to conduct re-identification or resurvey (Article 146, Item 3 of the Civil Procedure Law), (6) It is necessary to conduct further investigation (Article 146, Item 3 of the Civil Procedure Law), (7) Force majeure (Article 2 of the Provisions), and (8) Accident (Article 2 of the Provisions).
2. "Statutory reasons" in the table under "Reasons for adjournment" shows the proportion of the number of postponed court sessions in the total number of postponed court sessions within the statistical period for the above statutory reasons; and "other reasons" shows the proportion of the number of postponed court sessions in the total number of postponed court sessions within the statistical period for reasons other than the above statutory.

Number of Court Sessions

Court Number of court sessions The maximum number of court sessions is exceeded The maximum number of court sessions is not exceeded
Number of cases Number of cases Rate Number of cases Rate
Summary Procedure Ordinary Procedure Summary Procedure Ordinary Procedure Summary Procedure Ordinary Procedure Summary Procedure Ordinary Procedure Summary Procedure Ordinary Procedure
High... 75 923 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 75 923 100.00% 100.00%
First... 68 3800 1 3 1.47% 0.08% 67 3797 98.53% 99.92%
Second... 35 7018 1 6 2.86% 0.09% 34 7012 97.14% 99.91%
Third... 24 12978 0 1 0.00% 0.01% 24 12977 100.00% 99.99%
Fourth... 1 960 0 2 0.00% 0.21% 1 958 100.00% 99.79%
Intell... 9 1640 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 9 1640 100.00% 100.00%
Financ... 9 1856 1 29 11.11% 1.56% 8 1827 88.89% 98.44%
Dongcheng 7082 7098 4 3 0.06% 0.04% 7078 7095 99.94% 99.96%
Xicheng 6490 14629 145 35 2.23% 0.24% 6345 14594 97.77% 99.76%
Chaoyang 20421 34569 13 20 0.06% 0.06% 20408 34549 99.94% 99.94%
Haidian 7086 20806 10 16 0.14% 0.08% 7076 20790 99.86% 99.92%
Fengtai 16044 11608 8 3 0.05% 0.03% 16036 11605 99.95% 99.97%
Shijingshan 6769 3852 352 0 5.20% 0.00% 6417 3852 94.80% 100.00%
Mentougou 1815 1120 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 1815 1120 100.00% 100.00%
Fangshan 5539 8076 0 1 0.00% 0.01% 5539 8075 100.00% 99.99%
Tongzhou 8493 11081 17 14 0.20% 0.13% 8476 11067 99.80% 99.87%
Daxing 10105 8828 3 2 0.03% 0.02% 10102 8826 99.97% 99.98%
Shunyi 11154 5006 44 2 0.39% 0.04% 11110 5004 99.61% 99.96%
Changping 4744 11507 3 29 0.06% 0.25% 4741 11478 99.94% 99.75%
Huairou 2850 2206 4 5 0.14% 0.23% 2846 2201 99.86% 99.77%
Pinggu 3637 1364 9 10 0.25% 0.73% 3628 1354 99.75% 99.27%
Miyun 2949 1995 1 4 0.03% 0.20% 2948 1991 99.97% 99.80%
Yanqing 2620 2064 2 2 0.08% 0.10% 2618 2062 99.92% 99.90%
Internet... 6888 5421 12 5 0.17% 0.09% 6876 5416 99.83% 99.91%

Statistical description:
1.Legal basis: According to Article 3 of ‘Decision of the Supreme People's Court to Amend the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Strictly Regulating the Issues Concerning Trial Period Extension and Continuances in Civil and Commercial Cases’ (Amended in 2019): "For a civil or commercial case tried under the formal procedures, the number of continuances may not exceed two; and for a civil or commercial case tried under the summary procedures and the fast-tract procedures for small claims, the number of continuances may not exceed one.”
2.The table of "Cases that have not exceeded the maximum number of court sessions" and its proportion, refers to the total number of cases completed during the statistical period in which the number of adjourned court sessions has not exceeded the maximum number of adjournments stipulated in the above judicial interpretation, as well as the proportion of such cases in the total number of cases completed during the same period.
3. The table of "Cases that have exceeded the maximum number of court sessions" and its proportion, refers to the total number of cases completed during the statistical period in which the number of adjourned court sessions has exceeded the maximum number of adjournments stipulated in the above judicial interpretation, as well as the proportion of such cases in the total number of cases completed during the same period.